TORN APART: FAMILY COURTS UNCOVERED

“Are Britain’s Family Courts no longer fit for purpose, with judges hiding poor decisions behind secrecy rules designed to protect children? In a shocking film that was 2 years in the making, reporter Louise Tickles goes ‘as far as we legally can’ to expose cases of families traumatised by their encounters with a seemingly unaccountable system and what changes are needed.”

- Pick of the Day, The Telegraph

“A shaft of light into a closed world, a darkened room.”

2 years in the making – for the first time Dispatches reveals what is really going on behind closed doors in family courts. With shocking, personal testimony; never-before-seen footage of children being forcibly removed from safe, loving, homes at midnight and alarming results from the biggest ever questionnaire of family court users and family lawyers, Dispatches asks what change is needed to hold judges to account?
Click here for more information.

About Louise Tickle

Louise is a multi-award winning journalist who has reported extensively on domestic abuse, child protection and the family courts. She has been invited to train judges at the Judicial College, has spoken on transparency issues to family barristers, solicitors and social workers at conferences, and in 2018 was invited by the then President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby, to give the second annual Bridget Lindley Memorial Lecture which explored the reasons for greater scrutiny and accountability in the family justice system. She is currently developing a Family Court Reporting Pilot funded by The Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, which hopes to test out ways of supporting journalists to report on family court hearings held in private. In 2019 she crowdfunded and won a challenge in the Court of Appeal against a reporting restriction order unlawfully made by a deputy high court judge in a family court. In 2016 she was shortlisted for The Orwell Prize for Journalism, and won the Bar Council Legal Reporting Award, for a body of work including reporting on the family justice system. She is the founder/director of Scrutiny, a new social enterprise that supports journalists and citizen investigators to hold to account parts of the state and public-facing organisations that operate behind closed doors, and is a committee member of The Transparency Project, a charity which aims to promote greater understanding of family law. She tweets @louisetickle, blogs at www.OpenFamilyCourt.wordpress.com, and highlights of her work can be found at www.louisetickle.co.uk

 
210705CMC_Tickle-087.jpg

Our Survey and Questionnaire

Dispatches also conducted the largest ever survey of legal professionals practicing family law, asking them about their experiences of the various levels of court

We asked 297 experienced family solicitors and barristers about this type of forced removal

  • They reported they had witnessed 42 orders for this type of removal over the last 3 years.

There are at least 13,000 solicitors and barristers practising family law in England and Wales.

Dispatches also set up questionnaires online for those who have used the family courts. This is not a representative sample, because those who replied were self-selecting however over 4,000 users responded, including 2,776 mothers and 1,147 fathers, making it the largest ever survey of family court users:

  • Over 2,000 parents said they felt the judge was actively hostile towards them.

  • Among those whose cases had concluded, over 70% of both mothers and fathers were unhappy with the outcome.

  • 67% agreed or strongly agreed that their children’s mental health had been affected by participation in the family court proceedings.

  • Court proceedings were reported to have taken on average 18 months to complete, with 1 in 10 cases lasting more than 5 years. The average cost of proceedings was said to be around £13,000, though 1 in 20 claimed they had spent over £100,000.

  • A 1960 law, intended to protect children, says that nothing that happens in a family court can ever be reported without the express permission of the judge. It is a criminal offence to report what has happened in court and if no-one can ever know the specifics of the problems, they can’t be fixed.

Claire Waxman, Victim’s Commissioner for London, “The family courts need a major overhaul, that secrecy is actually enabling abusers and so it’s really important that we lift the lid off the family courts and we actually understand the court decisions that are made”

Among the legal professionals one of the most disturbing results was the conclusion that the majority felt the lower courts (where most cases are heard) are particularly letting down victims of domestic abuse and their children.

When asked how well judges understood domestic abuse and coercive control:

  • 4 out of 5 lawyers who responded said magistrates have a poor or very poor understanding

  • 1 in 3 said District Judges also have a poor or very poor understanding of these issues

RECEPTION

RUNTIME
47 minutes

REPORTER
Louise Tickle

PRODUCER
Patricia Doherty

EXECUTIVE PRODUCER
Brian Woods

PRODUCER/DIRECTOR
Anna Hall

RELEASED
July 2021

SUPPORT AND ADVICE


Victimfocus
https://www.victimfocus.org.uk/

Survivor Family Network
https://survivorfamilynetwork.com/

Childline
https://www.childline.org.uk/

Support Through Court
https://supportthroughcourt.org

National Domestic Abuse Helpline
https://nationadahelpline.org.uk

OnlyDads
https://onlydads.org

Rights of Women
https://rightsofwomen.org.uk/

Julia’s husband - a convicted paedophile - took her to court 37 times to get her children

Julia’s husband - a convicted paedophile - took her to court 37 times to get access to their children after his past was exposed. But Julia's nightmare in the family court system continued for eight years. This is her story.

Posted by Dispatches - Channel 4 on Tuesday, 20 July 2021

Picks of the day:

Screenshot 2021-07-27 at 14.58.44.png
Previous
Previous

Finding My Family

Next
Next

Dispatches: The Truth About Long COVID